Evidence & Field Standards Hub

Evidence Standards
Hub

Before We Call It Paranormal

PRN checks evidence, sources, normal explanations, safety and context before treating anything as potentially unexplained. This page explains how — and why the checking matters more than the conclusion.

  1. Step 1ClaimA report or observation comes in.
  2. Step 2Sources checkedContext and reliability are reviewed.
  3. Step 3Normal explanations ruled outConventional causes are checked first.
  4. Step 4Safety & contextRisk, privacy, and sensitivity are considered.
  5. Step 5Verdict labelAn honest, evidence-based label is applied.

Evidence First: We exhaust normal explanations before considering the extraordinary.

Transparent Process: Our methods are open, repeatable, and continuously refined.

Respectful Standards: Every witness, site, and claim is treated with care and dignity.

Section 1

Evidence Quality Framework

Every report moves through the same stages. PRN labels where it currently stands — not what it proves.

  1. Intake

    Unreviewed claim

    A report or claim has been received but not yet checked.

    Does NOT mean: This is not a judgment on the reporter. It means PRN has not yet reviewed the material.

    Witness account

    Information currently rests mainly on a witness statement.

    Does NOT mean: This does not mean the account is false or unreliable. It means it has not been independently corroborated.

    Media submitted

    Photos, video, or audio have been submitted but not fully reviewed.

    Does NOT mean: Submitted media is not automatically evidence. It requires review for context, quality, and potential contamination.

  2. Context added

    Metadata present

    Useful supporting details such as time, location, or device information are available.

    Does NOT mean: Metadata supports analysis but does not by itself confirm or deny a claim.

    Source-backed context

    Official, historical, archive, or research context has been added.

    Does NOT mean: Added context improves understanding. It does not prove or disprove the original claim.

    Environmental context checked

    Likely environmental factors have been considered.

    Does NOT mean: Checking environmental factors is standard practice. A check does not mean a normal explanation was found.

    Equipment context checked

    Equipment or tool limitations have been considered.

    Does NOT mean: Equipment readings require context. A check acknowledges that instruments have known limitations.

  3. Outcome

    Conventional explanation identified

    A normal, non-paranormal explanation appears to account for the reported experience.

    Does NOT mean: This is the most common outcome. It is not a criticism of the reporter — most unusual experiences have conventional causes.

    Inconclusive

    There is not enough reliable information to reach a stronger conclusion.

    Does NOT mean: This is a common and expected outcome. Inconclusive does not mean paranormal. It means more information would be needed to say more.

    Requires follow-up

    More information is needed before PRN can assess further.

    Does NOT mean: A request for more information is standard, not a sign that something unusual has been confirmed.

  4. Restricted

    Sensitive / restricted

    The material involves safety, privacy, grief, sacred/restricted context, or another reason for caution.

    Does NOT mean: Restriction protects people and places. It is not a comment on whether the underlying claim is valid.

    Not suitable for publication

    PRN will not publish this openly because of privacy, evidential weakness, or sensitivity.

    Does NOT mean: This is not a judgment on the reporter. It means the material does not meet the threshold for responsible public display.

PRN treats “unexplained” as an honest acknowledgement of uncertainty — not as evidence of paranormal activity. Most reports resolve to conventional explanations. That is a good outcome, not a disappointing one.

Section 2

Contamination & False Positives

Common normal explanations to check before escalating concern. Filter by category, or browse the full list.

Settling sounds

Timber-frame buildings expand and contract with temperature. Creaking, popping, and banging noises are normal, especially at night when heating cycles change.

Building and Structure

Doors opening or closing

Draughts, pressure differentials between rooms, and poorly fitted latches cause doors to move without contact. Check for open windows and ventilation paths.

Building and Structure

Cold spots

Poor insulation, draughts from gaps in floors, walls, or windows, and convection currents create localised temperature drops. Use a thermometer and check for air movement sources.

Building and Structure

Knocking in pipes

Water hammer (pressure surges in pipes) causes loud banging. Radiator systems create ticking, clanking, and gurgling as they heat and cool.

Plumbing, Heating, and Electrical

Flickering lights

Loose bulbs, aging wiring, dimmer switch incompatibility, and utility supply fluctuations cause flickering. If persistent, contact a qualified electrician — this can indicate a genuine fire risk.

Plumbing, Heating, and Electrical

Scratching and movement sounds

Mice, rats, birds, squirrels, bats, and insects inside walls, roofs, and floors create scratching, scurrying, and tapping sounds, especially at night.

Wildlife and Pests

Unexplained smells

Animal droppings, deceased animals in cavities, and nesting materials produce unusual odours. Pest control professionals can investigate.

Wildlife and Pests

Strange sounds in wind

Wind interacting with building features (chimneys, eaves, gaps) creates whistling, moaning, and humming. Changes in atmospheric pressure affect how sound travels indoors.

Weather, Airflow, and Air Pressure

Vibrations

Heavy traffic, nearby construction, underground trains, and industrial equipment cause low-frequency vibrations that can be felt but not always heard.

Weather, Airflow, and Air Pressure

Orbs in photographs

Dust, moisture, insects, and lens flare cause circular artefacts in flash photography. These are among the most common and well-documented photographic false positives.

Light, Optics, and Photography

Light anomalies

Reflections from windows, mirrors, polished surfaces, vehicle headlights, and streetlights create moving light effects indoors.

Light, Optics, and Photography

Sounds on recordings

Background noise, electronic interference, compression artefacts, and pareidolia (the brain finding patterns in random noise) account for the vast majority of EVP-style recordings.

Audio and EVP Contamination

Voices heard in buildings

Sound can travel through ducts, pipes, thin walls, and open windows from neighbouring properties, roads, or outdoor sources.

Audio and EVP Contamination

High EMF readings

Domestic wiring, appliances, transformers, and mobile phone masts generate electromagnetic fields. Consumer EMF meters detect these — they do not detect paranormal activity. High EMF exposure may cause unease or headaches in some individuals.

EMF, RF, and Equipment Interference

Equipment malfunctions

Batteries drain faster in cold conditions. Consumer electronics malfunction for many reasons including age, moisture, temperature, and manufacturing defects.

EMF, RF, and Equipment Interference

Sleep paralysis

A well-documented medical phenomenon where the body remains temporarily immobilised during waking. Often accompanied by vivid hallucinations, a sense of presence, and chest pressure. Not paranormal.

Human Perception, Stress, and Sleep-Related Factors

Hypnagogia and hypnopompia

Hallucinations experienced during the transition between wakefulness and sleep. Can include visual, auditory, and tactile sensations. Normal neurological function.

Human Perception, Stress, and Sleep-Related Factors

Heightened perception under stress

Anxiety, grief, sleep deprivation, and hypervigilance increase sensitivity to ambiguous stimuli. The brain fills in gaps with pattern-matched explanations.

Human Perception, Stress, and Sleep-Related Factors

Prior knowledge

Knowing a location's 'haunted' reputation significantly increases the likelihood of interpreting ambiguous experiences as paranormal. This is well-documented in psychology research.

Social Contamination and Expectation Bias

Group reinforcement

Groups investigating together may amplify each other's interpretations. Independent documentation before group discussion reduces this effect.

Social Contamination and Expectation Bias

This is a representative sample. PRN’s full false-positive reference will expand as reviewed entries are added. If you are unsure whether your experience has a normal explanation, the safest first step is always to check for conventional causes and contact a relevant professional if there is any safety concern.

Section 3

What Happens After a Report

If you have reported something unusual, here is what to expect and how to stay safe.

What PRN can do

  • Receive and securely store your report.
  • Review it against known normal explanations.
  • Add environmental, historical, and source context where available.
  • Label the report honestly using PRN's evidence framework.
  • Signpost you to relevant resources, professionals, or next steps.
  • Protect your privacy and anonymise your information where requested.

What PRN cannot do

  • Confirm or deny that something paranormal has occurred.
  • Provide medical, psychological, or legal advice.
  • Visit your location or conduct in-person investigations in most cases.
  • Guarantee a definitive explanation for every experience.
  • Act as an emergency or crisis service.

How to document safely

  • Write down what happened as soon as possible — include dates, times, locations, weather, who was present, and what you observed directly (not what you interpreted).
  • Take photographs or video if safe to do so — do not put yourself at risk.
  • Note any environmental factors: temperature, sounds, smells, lighting, building condition.
  • Do not alter, filter, or enhance original recordings or photographs.
  • Keep original files — copies and edits should be clearly marked as such.

Privacy

  • PRN treats all submitted reports as confidential by default.
  • Your name and contact details are not published without your explicit consent.
  • Location details are generalised unless you specifically approve precise information.
  • You can request deletion of your report at any time by contacting info@paranormalresponsenetwork.org.

When to contact a professional — not PRN

Structural, electrical, gas, or carbon monoxide concerns

Contact a qualified tradesperson or emergency services.

Health symptoms: headaches, nausea, confusion, breathing difficulty

Contact your GP, hospital, or emergency services.

Persistent distress, anxiety, sleep disruption, or fear

Speak with a mental health professional or your GP.

Security concerns: intruders, trespass, or threats

Contact the police.

Concerns about a child or vulnerable person

Contact local safeguarding services or social services.

A note on uncertainty

Most unusual experiences have conventional explanations. That is a positive outcome — it means you are safe and the cause is understood. If your experience remains unexplained after review, that is an honest acknowledgement of uncertainty, not a confirmation of paranormal activity. PRN exists to help you understand what happened through careful, respectful investigation — not to tell you what to believe.

Section 4

How PRN Labels Sources

Not all sources are equal. Every source PRN cites carries one of these labels — the same labels you’ll see on case files — so you can always see what kind of information you’re looking at.

TrustedContextualLead / unverifiedExcluded
trusted

Official record

Government, heritage body, museum, or national library source. Generally high trust.

trusted

Academic source

University, research institute, or peer-reviewed scholarly source.

trusted

Archive / museum source

Museum collection, archive entry, or digitised holdings. May require rights check.

contextual

News report

Journalism from a recognised outlet. Varies in reliability. Not automatically evidence.

trusted

Court / inquest / public record

Legal or official public records. Factual reporting of proceedings.

contextual

Historical record

Documented historical material. Context, not proof of current activity.

contextual

Folklore source

Oral or literary tradition, mythic figure, or place-lore motif. Cultural context only — never evidence.

contextual

Oral history

Testimony or memory with cultural or historical value. Context, not automatic evidence.

contextual

Living belief / traditional context

Ongoing community practice or belief system. Respect required. Never entertainment.

lead

Media claim

TV, YouTube, podcast, blog, or documentary item. Interesting but not evidential core.

lead

Public claim

Publicly reported claim without PRN verification. A lead, not proof.

lead

User-generated claim

Forum, social media, or self-posted anecdote. Discovery only — no automatic trust.

lead

Tourism claim

Ghost tour or haunted-destination marketing. Not evidence.

lead

Paranormal investigation claim

Investigator or creator report using tools and methods. Informative but never proof.

contextual

Sensitive historical context

Documented difficult history presented soberly. Never framed as causing paranormal activity.

contextual

Sacred / restricted context

Material that should not be flattened, mapped, or ritualised publicly. Often admin-only.

excluded

Do not use

AI-generated slop, gore clickbait, trespass bait, unreliable scraping. Excluded.

A source can be useful without being strong evidence. A YouTube video may be a lead worth noting. A folklore record may provide centuries of cultural context. But neither is proof. PRN labels sources so you can always see the basis of any claim or context.

Section 5

Investigator Method Library

Responsible investigation practices that protect evidence quality, people, and places. These are recommendations, not proof of anything — and summaries, not full procedures. See Field Readiness for the detailed version.

Permission and Access

PRN recommends never entering private property, restricted areas, or protected sites without explicit permission. Trespass is illegal, unethical, and invalidates any evidence collected. Always confirm access rights before a site visit.

Basic Risk Assessment

Before any site visit, PRN recommends assessing physical hazards: structural condition, electrical safety, air quality, access and egress, weather, wildlife, and lone-working risks. Safety always comes before investigation.

Witness Handling

PRN recommends using open, non-leading questions. Do not suggest experiences, prompt specific answers, or share other witness accounts before independent statements are recorded. Leading questions contaminate evidence.

Environmental Baselines

PRN recommends recording baseline conditions before investigation begins: temperature, humidity, ambient sound levels, EMF readings, light levels, and air movement. Without baselines, anomalous readings cannot be meaningfully assessed.

Evidence Logging

PRN recommends recording everything systematically: date, time, location, equipment used, operator, conditions, and observations. Maintain a continuous log throughout. Gaps in documentation weaken evidence quality.

Preserving Originals

PRN recommends never altering, filtering, enhancing, or cropping original photographs, audio, or video. Work on copies and clearly label any processing applied. Original files are the evidence — everything else is interpretation.

Photo, Video, and Audio Basics

PRN recommends understanding your equipment's limitations before reviewing captures as anomalous. Know what causes lens flare, orbs, noise artefacts, and compression distortion. Review the false-positive library first.

Equipment Limitations

Consumer investigation equipment has significant limitations. EMF meters detect electromagnetic fields from many sources. Spirit boxes scan radio frequencies. No consumer device has been scientifically validated as detecting paranormal phenomena.

Respect for Sites, History, and People

PRN recommends treating every location, its history, and the people connected to it with respect. Do not sensationalise tragedy. Do not disturb memorials, graves, or sacred spaces. Do not publish identifying details of private individuals without consent.

Safeguarding

If children, vulnerable adults, or people in distress are involved, PRN recommends prioritising their wellbeing above investigation. Contact appropriate services. Never continue an investigation that puts someone at risk.

For detailed field procedures, checklists, and training material, see the PRN Field Readiness section.

Field Readiness →

For equipment specifications, limitations, and comparison guides, see the PRN Equipment Hub.

Equipment Hub →

Historical and Sensitive Content

PRN includes documented historical context where it is public, source-backed, and relevant. Difficult history — including conflict, disaster, and tragedy — is presented as factual context only. It is never framed as evidence of paranormal activity, and is never presented with sensationalism or dark-tourism language. Recent or private tragedy defaults to restricted handling.

“A documented serious event is associated with this area. PRN includes this as historical context only. It is not evidence of paranormal activity.”

If historical or sensitive context appears in PRN material, it will carry the label ‘Sensitive historical context’ and the notice above.

Reporting Wizard

Start a new report

Case Archive

See labels applied in practice

AI Analysis Lab

How AI assists, under review

Field Readiness

Check your readiness

Equipment Hub

Know your tools

Contact PRN

Get in touch

Before We Call It Paranormal | Paranormal Response Network